Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kenteishu


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Mailer Diablo 08:14, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

Kenteishu
Spam for a game in development. Staecker 02:25, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

Hmn, that's not nice. I'm just trying to get some exposure. =/ —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Kenteishu (talk • contribs).


 * Delete. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. This line pretty much sealed it's fate "We are currently in the Pre-Development stage of the game". Um...no. Alphachimp  talk  02:53, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
 * It should also be noted that WP:NOT a publisher of original thought, WP:NOT a soapbox, WP:NOT a free host. Alphachimp  talk  02:55, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, please don't use Wikipedia to gain exposure. Non-notable and non-existant game - link to forum with a handfull of posts is only link.  Kuru  talk  02:54, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

We're in development, I didn't type that, I'm not trying to start any bs. If it's that big a' deal, delete it, Jesus. It's not non - existent, we've been developing the actual game for a while, the forum is pretty new, because I don't like using stolen software, so I suggest you become more knowledgeable about the subject you're speaking so strongly about, before you judge it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Kenteishu (talk • contribs).


 * Delete Please don't take this discussion personally Kenteishu. Wikipedia is not a place for advertising or a place to "gain exposure" for your current project. Once your game becomes notable someone will very likely create an article about the game. DrunkenSmurf 03:18, 25 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete. Wikipedia isn't really a place for you to get exposure.  --ColourBurst 04:04, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, per above discussion. linas 04:38, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not free ad space. It is not here for you to 'get some exposure'. --DarkAudit 13:11, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per author's admission is violates WP:SPAM, WP:VAIN and Wikipedia, she ain't a web hosting service, so take off! take off is much stronger in Canadian english than you might otherwise guess WilyD 14:02, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. -- Big  top  ( tk | cb | em | ea ) 16:29, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete: as game isn't here yet. Good luck with the game development though. Stephen B Streater 16:37, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete: Not notable (yet?). E    Asterion  u talking to me? 18:55, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Clearly advert. Colonial One 20:08, 25 July 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.