Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kentucky Route 342


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Kentucky Route 342
The result was keep per WP:SNOW. (non-admin closure)  Imzadi 1979  →   05:26, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG due to only having one source, which is a passing mention. Kirbanzo (talk) 15:01, 7 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep. I fail to see how a state DOT route log that lists every intersection and bridge for the entire Kentucky state highway system in Mercer County is just a passing mention. Does it need more sources?  Yes, definitely.  Does not having more sources mean the article should be deleted?  Absolutely not. –Fredddie™ 11:04, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep - Time and again, articles about state highways have been proven notable at AFD. Just because this article has only one source does not mean it should be deleted, more information can be added to the article.  Dough   4872   11:37, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep: Most highways with much to say about them are automatically notable; in this case, WP:USRD/NT takes priority over WP:GNG. ToThAc (talk) 15:28, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep - Article has more than one source, confirming its existence. Precedents have shown these types of articles have been kept. Nova Chrysalia   (Talk)  16:12, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kentucky-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:09, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:09, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:09, 10 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep per WP:ROADOUTCOMES, generally described. This will eventually end up keeping as sources clearly collaborate (unless it's a hoax). --Quek157 (talk) 16:56, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
 * If it's a hoax, Google Maps is in on it. –Fredddie™ 22:12, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
 * hope those pictures aren't an April fool joke. anyway since this is clearly a freeway page, no reason to delete as it's clearly notable.Quek157 (talk) 08:41, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
 * User Note - I did not meant that I deem this as a hoax, what I meant is to express that unless it is a hoax, this will be surely kept (i.e. WP:SNOW). I apologize for this in this Afd, and not an excuse, but this nominator can label such articles a hoax, very sorry for the ad hominem.Quek157 (talk) 21:47, 11 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep per WP:USRD/NT and long standing precedence reflected in WP:ROADOUTCOMES. A cite book was added. Sam Sailor 00:11, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep per long-held roads precedent at AfD.  Sounder Bruce  05:08, 12 May 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.