Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kenya Cuevas Fuentes


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was withdrawn. ✗ plicit  14:27, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

Kenya Cuevas Fuentes

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:SIGCOV. Single effective reference and that is tenuous at best. Fails WP:BIO.  scope_creep Talk  14:20, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
 * This article cited eight sources when nominated. Which is considered to be the single effective one? Phil Bridger (talk) 17:54, 19 June 2022 (UTC)


 * Speedy Keep. When searching news, I found lots of sources in Spanish, then when I searched in English, I dropped the Fuentes and found some more. I added a bunch of these to the article. It's easily significant, extremely in-depth coverage. Easily meets GNG with the added sources, be careful what you search for. Here's an English source to go with the dozen or so Spanish sources now in the article. . Jacona (talk) 18:16, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Some more...,. The sources I've found include the BBC, various Mexican sources, Cuba, United States. This subject has international coverage, lots of it, and in extreme depth. Jacona (talk) 18:18, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep per Jacona. 8 13 generally reliable sources seem like she is notable.  interstate five   13:57, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment Coolio. I found a couple of big articles, really big, so there is more than enough coverage. Nomination Withdrawn   scope_creep Talk  16:25, 20 June 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.