Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kenyan Section of the International Commission of Jurists


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus.  Sandstein  12:54, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

Kenyan Section of the International Commission of Jurists

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

no evidence of notability. I see a number of mentions in G News,, but I can not find anything substantial.  DGG ( talk ) 04:14, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. North America1000 11:46, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. North America1000 11:46, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Kenya-related deletion discussions. North America1000 11:47, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep. I'm prepared to accept that they satisfy GNG, and, frankly, I think they are influential and important. They have, for example, influenced judicial reform and are a "key knowledge repository" on the subject of judicial integrity . Without prejudice to the question of notability, this seems a plausible redirect to its parent organisation, the ICJ, with mergeable content. James500 (talk) 22:17, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Merge and Redirect to International Commission of Jurists. It's a division of a larger organization. Our article on the parent organization doesn't talk about the Kenyan Section currently, but there are enough sources to justify a mention there and redirect. Not enough to justify a stand-alone article, though. &mdash;  Rhododendrites talk  \\ 19:01, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 10:04, 20 July 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95  Talk  18:00, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep One of 21 autonomous "National Sections" of the ICJ: our article mentions the existence of National Sections in the lead, but does not expand upon them. The main news coverage of the Kenyan section or "chapter" in the past few years was when they sought and obtained an arrest warrant for the president of Sudan, which unsurprisingly led to a breakdown of diplomatic relations Noyster  (talk),  09:30, 4 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.