Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kenzie MacKinnon (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Nova Scotia Liberal Party leadership election, 2007. (non-admin closure) SST  flyer  01:21, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Kenzie MacKinnon
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Although this was kept in a deletion discussion in 2008, Wikipedia's notability and sourcing standards have been tightened up considerably in the eight years since then. At the time, WP:NPOL allowed non-winning candidates for the leadership of a political party to be considered notable on that basis -- but evolving consensus has since deprecated that as not an adequate claim of notability anymore: if the person doesn't get over an inclusion criterion for some other reason (e.g. having already held another notable office, or having preexisting notability in some other field of endeavour), then their non-winning leadership bid no longer constitutes sufficient notability in and of itself. But nothing else here gets him over NPOL, and the volume of sourcing isn't good enough to claim WP:GNG. Delete, or redirect to Nova Scotia Liberal Party leadership election, 2007. Bearcat (talk) 01:48, 6 March 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:13, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  Nordic   Dragon  12:42, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.  Nordic   Dragon  12:42, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kharkiv07  ( T ) 00:38, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Redirect at best as there may not be any serious needs for deleting and this could later be improved if and ever need be. Certainly questionably notable though, SwisterTwister   talk  05:18, 27 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.