Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kepler-1002b


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:28, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

Kepler-1002b

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Following on from WP:Articles for deletion/Kepler-1003b, fails WP:NASTRO, in particlar WP:NASTCRIT. Only coverage is various exoplanet database listings and the discovery paper where it is one of 1,284 new planets and not even listed under this name but as KOI-1893. No popular coverage, nothing apparently note-worthy. Lithopsian (talk) 14:28, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 16:28, 25 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete Per, at a minimum, WP:TOOSOON. The physical parameters associated with this object are not particularly notable, nor are the circumstances related to its discovery. JoJo Anthrax (talk) 16:42, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete Only found in databases or papers. Loooke (talk) 13:39, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete It's a stub, largely because there is no other information. Fails WP:NASTRO, all the information in the article belongs as entries in a list, not a separate article. Tarl N. ( discuss ) 15:20, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete: fails WP:GNG. Little more than a data card. Praemonitus (talk) 15:55, 27 April 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.