Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kepler-1003b


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 04:57, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

Kepler-1003b

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:NASTRO, in particlar WP:NASTCRIT. Only coverage is various exoplanet database listings and the discovery paper where it is one of 1,284 new planets and not even listed under this name but as KOI-1893. No popular coverage, nothing apparently note-worthy. Lithopsian (talk) 12:53, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 13:28, 17 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Comment, it's quite something that space exploration has advanced to the point where a giant planet can be unnotable. SpinningSpark 16:06, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Or any planet for that matter. Now they're announcing them a 1000+ at a time, and pretty soon there will be a dedicated satellite that should discover them by the tens of thousand all on its own.  Same could have been said about supernovae a couple of decades back, now about 50,000 have been seen, but the exoplanet count is going to pass that number very quickly.  Lithopsian (talk) 16:47, 17 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Comment: Delete as WP:TOOSOON, without prejudice to future creation once the starships reach it.--Milowent • hasspoken  19:37, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. As per another similar object, fails WP:NASTRO. Contains only information pulled items on a list. The list is notable, not every entry in the list. Tarl N. ( discuss ) 00:47, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete: Agree with above. Nothing found on Google Scholar. Its just a data card with some formatting. Praemonitus (talk) 22:15, 24 April 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.