Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kepler 1606


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mojo Hand (talk) 21:24, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Kepler 1606

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:NASTRO. No published papers primarily this star or a small number of stars including this one. No lay coverage. See also Kepler-1606b, the only English Wikipedia page that links to this one. Lithopsian (talk) 16:27, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. Lithopsian (talk) 16:27, 18 April 2021 (UTC)


 * I made a very minor English correction today that doesn't affect the suitability for deletion, about which I have no opinion.   Athel cb (talk) 16:40, 18 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Redirect to List of exoplanets discovered in 2016. The star itself is non-notable per WP:NASTRO and lack of studies. The planet article at Kepler-1606b is probably also non-notable. Praemonitus (talk) 16:46, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
 * I don't see the point of making an AfD for the star separately. If the exoplanet is notable, the consensus is to merge with it. If the exoplanet is not notable, both should be deleted. In this particular case, there only two papers that mention the exoplanet, and only in a big list, so both articles should be deleted. Tercer (talk) 09:37, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
 * I've just nominated the exoplanet for deletion. I deliberately didn't bundle them in the same discussion  to avoid the situation of one being notable and the other not leading to a confused outcome, and also because I wasn't sure about the notability of the exoplanet.  Now I guess we'll find out.  Lithopsian (talk) 19:16, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
 * I know it's more work for you, but it would be better for everybody else if you researched the notability of both before bringing the matter to AfD; then either the planet is notable and the articles can be merged, avoiding AfD altogether, or both should be nominated in a bundle. Tercer (talk) 20:54, 19 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete Non-notable star with non-notable exoplanet. Tercer (talk) 21:03, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete as per Lithopsian and Tercer.PopePompus (talk)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.