Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ker's WingHouse


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. TravellingCari 04:50, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

Ker's WingHouse
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Blatant Advertisement Editor437 (talk) 02:30, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete As per nom. Proxy User (talk) 03:13, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. Notable company, with lots of references from reliable sources. See http://www.sptimes.com/News/032200/SouthPinellas/Newest_venue_s_sporti.shtml, http://www.accessmylibrary.com/coms2/summary_0286-7701766_ITM , http://www.accessmylibrary.com/coms2/summary_0286-17002267_ITM , http://www.accessmylibrary.com/coms2/summary_0286-18257851_ITM , http://www.accessmylibrary.com/coms2/summary_0286-11917854_ITM , http://www.accessmylibrary.com/coms2/summary_0286-11677222_ITM  -- Eastmain (talk) 03:33, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep removing the sentence or two of PR; far from a blatant advertisement. DGG (talk) 03:39, 2 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep Clearly notable. rootology ( C )( T ) 13:17, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - Notable, not a blatant advertisement, and the lawsuit win against Hooters is notable in itself. Risker (talk) 15:13, 4 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.