Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kerakat railway station


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) may the force be with you 01:27, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Kerakat railway station

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non notable, unreferenced. Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) may the force be with you 07:17, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 08:35, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 08:35, 29 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep - per well established consensus that all railway stations are presumed to be notable enough to sustain an article. Contrary to nom's claim, there is a reference. The article needs improvement, but that is no reason to delete it. Mjroots (talk) 11:53, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep per Mjroots. While the nom shouldn't have AfD's this less than two hours after article creation  (see WP:BITE), the article creator shares some of the blame for substandard writing.  Even newbies should bother to capitalize sentences and proper nouns.--Oakshade (talk) 16:46, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
 * snowwball keep -M.Altenmann >t 19:25, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep - All railway stations are notable enough. In this case, wirting and layout can be improved. --βα£α(ᶀᶅᶖᵵᵶ) 19:03, 30 March 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.