Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keratosis pharyngis


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. seicer &#x007C;  talk  &#x007C;  contribs  13:12, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

Keratosis pharyngis

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Definition, article isn't even beyond 2 sentences, either needs expansion to stub quality, or deletion until improved. Neuro √ Logic 18:44, 6 September 2008 (UTC) This entry was incomplete. Listing it now. ➨ ❝ ЯEDVERS ❞ has nothing to declare except his jeans 14:02, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Expand or speedy delete per nom. Han-Kwang (t) 15:50, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - now sufficient content to be a stub article. Han-Kwang (t) 15:32, 9 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions.   -- Fvasconcellos (t·c) 14:11, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. A minute spent on a Google search reveals a fair number of medical journals and other reliable sources, suggesting obvious possibility for expansion.  There is no deadline. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:27, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment I expanded it a little. There seems to be only a handful of available sources, but that doesn't mean a stub wouldn't be useful. Narayanese (talk) 15:15, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - A notable condition which might reasonably be searched for. The article needs to be webbed in. - Mdsummermsw (talk) 16:04, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - It definitely needs expanding, but there are enough published articles about the condition to justify its inclusion in wikipedia. When I was checking it out, I did notice that it sometimes appears under derivatives of the name (e.g. pharyngeal keratosis, keratosis pharyngea, and various older terms), so perhaps the article should reflect this, or the correct medical term confirmed. ~ Ciar ~  (Talk to me!)  17:22, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
 * keep- just like many medical, plant and other more scientific stubs we have. Sticky Parkin 21:26, 9 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep Its a stub, but we dont delete articles for being stubs RogueNinja talk  22:47, 9 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.