Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keren cytter


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep per the group nomination. ~ trialsanderrors 09:32, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

Keren cytter


Nominated for deletion by User:Opabinia regalis but nomination not carried through. Several assertions of notability in article, but all are hype or just paper thin. Some links at bottom but none are to reliable sources as such and some don't even appear to be related. Article, unintentionally, I'm sure, currently reads like a heap of crappy assertions. I don't know whether that can be cured by clean up, or if those crappy assertions are true or not. In short: bad article on good subject or bad article on bad subject? You decide. ➨  ЯEDVERS  21:05, 27 November 2006 (UTC) : Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached  Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks,
 * Delete Choice #3. Bad article on irrelevant subject. Yankee Rajput 02:37, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment oops, must have forgotten the parameter on the tag; it was bundled with the discussion on Anat Spiegel and Thomas Myrmel. There has already been some discussion of this article there, with several people opining that this is the notable one of the three in that group. My opinion is still to delete all three. Opabinia regalis 03:35, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
 * '''Double listing, see Articles for deletion/Anat Spiegel. ~ trialsanderrors 09:32, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.