Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kereta api Bantowi Eksekutif


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 02:33, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

Kereta api Bantowi Eksekutif

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Not in english - and although the specific rail service might exist (of which the Indonesian language details are clear about the etymology and service - I do not think adequate WP:RS exist to verify the notability - more likely the info would serve a purpose in a list of named railway services in Java. SatuSuro 12:20, 17 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions.  —SatuSuro 12:24, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
 *  Keep . Delete. Per statement by User:Davidelit having reviewed the copy and making the determination that the translated text fails notability. Guidelines clearly state that translation must be presented for articles on the English Wikipedia. However, a timeline of two weeks is the standard, after which time, it would be appropriate to discuss deletion. After a translation is provided, then we can review the article accordingly. Until then, the article is placed at WP:PNT. In my opinion, this is just jumping the gun a bit. Cindamuse (talk) 12:49, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not notable, fails WP:SIGCOV. Not even worth translating - it's about a night train that goes from Bandung to Slawi, the latter of which is the subject of a short unreferenced article. Davidelit (Talk) 13:13, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge to Rail transport in Indonesia, if the information can be verified. No great harm if it's deleted, as that article doesn't look too reliable either..... Sumbuddi (talk) 19:41, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
 *  Speedy Delete without prejudice for English recreation. G1Speedy deletion criteria specifies it includes "coherent non-English material, and poorly translated material."  Train passenger services are generally considered notable. --Oakshade (talk) 22:42, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment. Actually, G1 CSD is not applicable to "coherent non-English material, and poorly translated material". Cindamuse (talk) 09:58, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Hah! You're right!  I missed the word "excludes".--Oakshade (talk) 16:13, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:14, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Delete if it's still not translated by 28 October, in which time it has remained untranslated for two weeks. I can't translate it myself because I don't understand Indonesian. J I P  &#124; Talk 07:32, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete If it's translated into English, just let me know and I'll withdraw my !vote. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 08:47, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment - I can vouch for editors Davidelit and Sumbuddi's competency in Indonesian language as being well well above mine (aging brain - not enough practice) - and their comments should be taken as a very good guide as to the practicality of deleting rather than saving or translating SatuSuro 11:12, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.