Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keri Adams


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Tito xd (?!?) 01:53, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

Keri Adams
Notability in question. Main point of notability for this person is that she is a weekend/substitute anchor for a local news program. --NMChico24 02:19, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete couldn't this have been speedied? TheRingess 02:20, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
 * It always depends on the admin who reviews the speedy. I find that this kind of thing results in my speedy being overridden anyway (due to being "controversial"), and so I just send it straight here after removal of prod tag (usually by the page author, which is what happened in this case).  --NMChico24 02:52, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment You know, she is the only CTV anchor without a page, her co-anchor who also only hosts the 6 & 11 weekend news on CTV has a page, why can't she? — Preceding unsigned comment added by PlatypusBen (talk • contribs)
 * Weak delete Normally I'm for all things Canadian broadcasting, and I've heard the name before, but let's face it, weekend/substitute local news anchors are not inherently notable. They tend to come and go pretty quickly, as her own resume indicates. Her being mentioned on the station page should suffice. Also, the aforementioned Mike Killeen does not have a page.&mdash; stickguy (:^›)&mdash; home - talk - 02:43, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, no assertion of notability. Substitute local news anchors are not notable. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 03:08, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. JChap 20:19, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Lacking encyclopaedic notability. -- Alias Flood 00:07, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - still working her passgae. BlueValour 03:25, 8 July 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.