Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keri Sable (3rd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:10, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Keri Sable
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Two previous afds closed without consensus but recent discussions have solidified that technical sng passes cannot take priority over failing to pass the gng, in this case neither award passes pornbio and the sourcing is clearly sub gng worthy. Press releases and promotional interviews do not gng make. Spartaz Humbug! 20:22, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:59, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:00, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:00, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:00, 4 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete as a BLP lacking in reliable independents sources that discuss the subject directly and in detail. Sources listed are iafd, promotional profile at Wicked Pictures, award materials, or interviews -- none are suitable for establishing notability. Awards listed are not significant and well known. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:44, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete and here's to hoping we can be third time lucky!, Hasn't won any notable awards and nothing remotely reliable on Google, most sources are promotional and nothing more, Fails PORNBIO #1, #2 and #3 aswell as GNG. – Davey 2010 Talk 01:17, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. No qualifying awards. Grossly inadequate independent reliable sourcing. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006.   (talk) 11:08, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. Lacks significant coverage by independent reliable sources to pass GNG. No qualifying awards to pass PORNBIO. • Gene93k (talk) 14:38, 10 May 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.