Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kerim Agius


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   moot. Kerim Agius got A10'd. No prejudice against speedy renomination of the co-nominations. The Bushranger One ping only 18:49, 7 August 2012 (UTC) Result was delete. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 21:35, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

Kerim Agius

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  Cliff  Smith 16:51, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  Cliff  Smith 16:51, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

Previously deleted WP:A7, this recreation  is not  clear whether it  concerns an amateur or a professional  sportsperson, and if it meets WP:ATHLETE. The boxer is apparently aged 14 and the article is an an autobiography.Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 07:17, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

Also nominating Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 07:27, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Kieran Wright
 * Luke Nickelson
 * N/C vs. Luke Nickelson
 * So now there's also Kerim Agius vs. Luke Nickelson. You can nuke that one as well. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 12:58, 5 August 2012 (UTC)


 * And Bradley Holtom - this needs to be decided soon.Peter Rehse (talk) 13:29, 5 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete all are WP:TOOSOON and all are amateur meaning failure of WP:ATHLETE too. Seasider91 (talk) 10:09, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Interesting, all these articles created by the same user who appears to be Kerim Agius himself I have put a speedy tag on each of the boxers page but not the last one. Seasider91 (talk) 10:19, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete but not speedily. Non-professional - you can't be pro at 14. The link to the alleged professional record goes to that of Floyd Mayweather Jr who is both a pro and notable (one other goes to Danny Garcia's). If we delete following an AfD we can use G4 if they try again, as I feel will happen if speedy is used. Agius & Co may have futures in pro boxing - but they're still at school for about two more years and then they have to establish themselves in the big world. Amateur boxers may be notable - if there is enough real referencing. One fake per article suggests there is nothing to be given. Peridon (talk) 10:37, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:29, 3 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Classic me and my friends. Not at all notable - not even a likely to be notable in future.  All are unreferenced Biographies of Living people so should be deleted as a matter of course.Peter Rehse (talk) 01:41, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Definitely non-notable, no indication he will ever be notable.CaSJer (talk) 12:33, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - Article is currently lacking sufficient prose to properly identify the subject. Though prose can always be added, there appears to have been no attempt by the creator to do so. It can't be left this way. Notability has not been established. -- WikHead (talk) 21:04, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Schoolboys fighting - unsourced and probably unsourceable. Clear failure of WP:ATHLETE. Vanity pages. noq (talk) 13:06, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete all. The first Article nominated is already deleted, and the rest are practically blank anyway. The Mysterious El Willstro (talk) 06:51, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

NOTE: Kerim Agius has been speedy deleted as a copy of an article that already  existed as Kerim Agius (Boxer) which  has also already been deleted. To avoid confusion in  future, it's probably best to allow articles like these to retain their original  CSD templates rather than create messy  AfDs. The creator has been blocked for disruptive editing for the mass creation of non notable articles and possible socking. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk).


 * The only real advantage to AfDs is that once completed Speedy Delete is so much easier.Peter Rehse (talk) 08:36, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Except that where these articles were mostly clear CSDs, we now have to wait another 3 days before they can be deleted. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 08:59, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes, but when they're dealt with here, and then come back, we can G4 them... Peridon (talk) 20:43, 6 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment for the Good of the Order: Can we please close this discussion ostensibly on Kerim Agius and start a new AfD Debate for the 3 co-nominated Articles that have not already been deleted? It would just be a little more concise, for want of a better word. The Mysterious El Willstro (talk) 03:57, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.