Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kerim Gattás Asfura


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 04:17, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

Kerim Gattás Asfura

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable. Promotional piece by promotional editor for this minor researcher. Lacks coverage about him instead of by him. Has a decent number of references but they are a mainly by him. None are independent reliable sources with any depth of coverage about him. Is the lead author one was reasonably well cited postgrad publication but is that enough for WP:PROF? Given the nature of the article written by a serial spammer with a penchant for copyright violation and deception and fake claims of identity I'd suggest blowing it away. Stop rewarding spam editing. duffbeerforme (talk) 12:47, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  Jinkinson   talk to me  13:10, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.  Jinkinson   talk to me  13:10, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.  Jinkinson   talk to me  13:11, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 22:58, 9 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. Not notable at all. Credential is flimsy. Clearly a promotional article. "Co-authored chapter 17 of the 2009 book" is one of the lamest vitae I have seen for a scientist. What is his major breakthrough achievement, award, best-selling book? None. Chhandama (talk) 08:56, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. No evidence of notability. A h-index of 13 is not enough, nor does he meet WP:PROF in other ways. -- 120.23.170.232 (talk) 03:12, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.