Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kerio Operator (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Kerio Technologies. and feel free to use the article's history to access and merge any useful information to the target. Joyous! | Talk 00:40, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Kerio Operator
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

non or borderline notability product - press release and run of the mill news. Arguably it may (or may not) just satisfy WP:GNG but sourcing is weak, and per WP:PRODUCT company doesn't appear to be notable so can't do the correct thing and merge (hence speedy AfD relisting). Widefox ; talk 21:29, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - extreme weak notability plus clear promotion is grounds for deletion by the community, adhering to the guideline advanced by . - Brianhe (talk) 18:03, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete -- a vanity page on an unremarkable product. K.e.coffman (talk) 18:43, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Merge. into the copany article. There are two substantial reviews, which justifies coverage but nott necessarily a separate article. I know the company article is up for deletion also, but that would be a mistake, since it has several significant products.  DGG ( talk ) 03:59, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Nom agree (now realises AfD #1 was right) Agree with DGG (as usual) after a second look at the products. I changed my !vote at the company. Widefox ; talk 11:38, 25 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete and merge any usable material into Kerio Technologies. Shritwod (talk) 15:26, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Redirect then; anything useful can be picked up from the article history. K.e.coffman (talk) 15:34, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Merge Notability of this software alone is doubtful. Kerio Technologies is ideal target for merger. Pavlor (talk) 16:13, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 22:50, 29 November 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.