Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kerri Nicole McCaffrey


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete per WP:CSD — we only just discussed (and deleted) this two weeks ago under a different name; see Articles for deletion/(target). —David Eppstein (talk) 22:21, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

Kerri Nicole McCaffrey

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

BLP of local interest, but not notable enough for an encyclopedia entry. Books written are self-published. PROD removed with comment that the books made the "subject valid," but self-published books do not confer notability. Thargor Orlando (talk) 23:48, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:54, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:54, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:54, 11 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Weak keep per WP:GNG — Subject attracted significant coverage in 2005 over her changing identity, sparking a local political debate and receiving follow-on coverage in The Advocate. The lead sentence is not verified directly but suggests a lasting notability not unlike, say the Little Rock Nine.--Carwil (talk) 19:43, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
 * I couldn't find anything from The Advocate on a search, that would obviously very clearly change my mind on this. Can you share? Thargor Orlando (talk) 19:51, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment. "significant coverage" is an overstatement. It looks like the 1-event was covered in a local NJ newspaper. Agricola44 (talk) 16:38, 12 February 2015 (UTC).


 * Delete - I'm just not seeing enough coverage to satisfy WP:BIO. The only non-primary reliable sources I see are a couple in the Daily Record from around that time period. The Advocate story mentioned above would help, certainly. --&mdash;  Rhododendrites talk  \\ 23:16, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. This person is not notable per se and most of the sources are not WP:RS. The Daily Record is OK, but that seems to be local and also seems only to have covered the 1-event described in the article. Agricola44 (talk) 16:38, 12 February 2015 (UTC).
 * Delete. This is just WP:LOCALFAME, it seems. –Roscelese (talk &sdot; contribs) 20:58, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Teacher who does not pass any notability guidelines.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:23, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.