Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kerry Garvin


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. NorthAmerica1000 12:54, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

Kerry Garvin

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Appears to be an autobiography, References don't appear to establish WP:N War wizard90 (talk) 05:19, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

Disagree that the article should be deleted and is in accordance with WP policy. Wizard90 does not provide sufficient grounds for deletion. Article complies with reliable sources (e.g. Sports Illustrated, Gazetta, and recipient of awards), user policy, guidelines, and overall good and featured articles. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mguevarra1980 (talk • contribs) 14:18, 11 December 2014‎ (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:54, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:54, 11 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. One minor award in a minor film festival, the only claim to notability of any substance, is not sufficient to establish notability. As noted, this is a vanity autobiography of a non-notable person.TheLongTone (talk) 14:33, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

A "Best Actress" award is not a "minor" award, in my humble opinion. Sports Illustrated is also a prestigious publisher and individual was featured by said publisher as a model. She is also the face of an Elizabeth Arden perfume although that does not appear to be referenced in article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mguevarra1980 (talk • contribs) 20:09, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
 * It's an award given by a very minor film festival. One published photo does not make her notable.TheLongTone (talk) 14:48, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
 * I would also point out that Mguevarra1980 is a new account whose primary purpose seems to be editing this article & has seemingly taken over building the page from User:Kerrygarvin.TheLongTone (talk) 15:09, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 10:22, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete Non-notable T&A girl (I'm calling her that because 100% of Google image returns depict her scantily clad) with a suspicious IMDB entry (claiming three films, all unreleased indie/homemade projects, each with zero reviews or commentary). Supporting refs, at best, appear to be blog-lists for wank material. The accompanying picture's uploader (Mguevarra1980, who comments above) appears to have taken it from Garner's Facebook page (the image otherwise has zero Tineye matches), so that fails proper accreditation and will have to be deleted as well. Article contains zero biographical information; her Facebook page contains zero biographical information, and her "website" links under "About" on Facebook as well as her Youtube uploads are merely links directly back to the Facebook page. A modeling site is the best Google could scrounge for (alleged) details. At this point, we essentially have no way of determining if "Kerry Garvin" is a real person's actual name, or is the new pseudonym of a washed-up porn-star seeking to break into semi-respectability.)--Раціональне анархіст (talk) 14:37, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - If we could Keep purely based on Images I would but unfortunately we can't ....., Anyway back on topic - The article seems like more of an advertisement, Plus the cites aren't exactly brilliant (IMDb being the worst!), Anyway despite myself searching I can't fin any shred of notability so will have to say Delete. – Davey 2010  •  (talk)  18:16, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.