Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kerry Remsen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. North America1000 03:51, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

Kerry Remsen

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

As the article itself says (!) she only held minor roles in films; not covered by Reliable sources in any depth. In short, fails Notability. GRuban (talk) 21:34, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -  C HAMPION  (talk) (contributions) (logs) 22:26, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -  C HAMPION  (talk) (contributions) (logs) 22:26, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete "know only as a bit part actress" means "no significant roles" which means does not meet the notability criteria for actors.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:25, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:02, 28 November 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:20, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep, She had appeared as Pamela in 65 episodes of Tribes. A major role as one of the leading actors in Appointment with Fear. A significant part as Taffi Fisher in Dreams of Gold: The Mel Fisher Story,  one of the leading actors in Smart Alec as Samantha. She was one of the main actors in Ghoulies II, playing the part of Nicole. She had a decent part in Two Moon Junction as Carolee. She was also a significant cast member in Pumpkinhead playing the part of Maggie. She also had some good roles in various television series like Family Ties and Doogie Howser, M.D., etc. No problem giving a Keep vote here but I have to say that it doesn't come as any surprise that this attracted an AFD nomination. The article is a shabby mess! Karl Twist (talk) 08:48, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Nothing I would like more than to save this article, but can you find anything more in Reliable sources than a list of roles? A news article about her? Even some interviews? Honestly, I looked, and all I could find was a podcast interview on some guy's blog, hardly the most reliable or notable of sources. --GRuban (talk) 17:57, 6 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete Non-notable minor roles that go no further than 1995. sixty nine   • speak up •  01:03, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
 * It doesn't matter when her roles finished or she stopped working. She worked for 14 years from 1981 to 1995. She had more than a good handful of significant roles. The article page has had no thought or organization in it's creation that's all. Karl Twist (talk) 09:22, 9 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Comment, it's still a work in progress. From this here to this. I'm far from finished. Karl Twist (talk) 09:52, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Good luck. I would request the closing admin let you finish... however, for now, it looks like you're just adding lists of roles, either very minor roles, or moderate roles in very minor films (most of the "one of the group of teenagers killed by the slasher" type). --GRuban (talk) 18:41, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Hi GRuban, while some of the roles I have added are minor or moderate, some of the others are major roles and she has been female lead at least two films as well as major supporting actress in three others. Three of the horror films have significant cult following and value. Already as a recognized actress in the 80's horror genre (Pale in comparison to 60's and 70's horror IMO, but each to their own), her characters are recognized and remembered. This is why she is included on the bonus-features for the / Ghoulies II" Blu-ray Review. When this article was nominated for deletion, it consisted of nothing more than a C&P of IMDB listing and just 2 lines of intro about he. All of that was written in a messy misleading way. It resembled something the dog or cat had thrown up on the kitchen floor. Karl Twist (talk) 08:42, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 12:13, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Withdraw Nomination, or, if I can't do that since others have opined to delete, then Keep. Karl Twist's work needs to be rewarded; this is now a very thorough article. --GRuban (talk) 20:20, 16 December 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.