Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kesar


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to List of programmes broadcast by StarPlus. Should subsequent cleanup at the target render this not present, this can be handled at RfD. At the moment, it's the viable solution. Star  Mississippi  01:23, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

Kesar

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Subject fails WP:GNG Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 12:40, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and India.  Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 12:41, 22 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Keep. 3 years broadcast on Star Plus. A WP essay reminds us that "Television series, game shows, and talk shows broadcast nationally by a major network or produced by a major studio are usually kept. An exception is if a program was short-lived and/or aired in a market where reliable source coverage is scant." Or at the very least redirect to List of programmes broadcast by StarPlus, where it is obviously mentioned.- My, oh my! (Mushy Yank)  13:33, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Citing OUTCOMES is circular reasoning. If we don't have sufficient sources we cannot have a sufficient article. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 18:38, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you for this comment but I don"t think citing that essay implies circular reasoning. It is just standard practice based on common sense (a series broadcast for 4 years on a major network received exposure, hence probable notability). As for sources, if deemed insufficient for a standalone article, I can only repeat that I suggest redirect exactly for that reason. I'll leave it at that. - My, oh my! (Mushy Yank)  19:02, 22 October 2023 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:11, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Redirect. I reverted the redirect few days ago citing the above mentioned essay as Essays and information pages are not policy or guidelines that must be followed, but they are likely worthy of consideration. (WP:MEANING) But I was not able to find enough reliable independent sources required for a good article and Redirect to List of programmes broadcast by StarPlus looks like a better option . Sid95Q (talk) 19:59, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete: Subject fails GNG and WP:NTV/WP:RPRGM, nothing from WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth. The suggested redirect already needs cleanup per WP:NOTTVGUIDE and adding another non-notable entry will just result in more needed cleanup. Lists have guidelines such as WP:NOTTVGUIDE, and adding this will violate this guideline.  // Timothy :: talk  00:20, 5 November 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.