Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kesava Pillai of Kandamath


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. WP:NPASR per low participation herein. North America1000 05:37, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

Kesava Pillai of Kandamath

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not meet the basic notability criteria Marvellous Spider-Man (talk) 11:37, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:09, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:09, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:09, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 11:01, 18 August 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:04, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

The article has been carefully drafted and references from books have been included in the list of references. It is incredibly hard to find any history at all in this period in India and often local sources such as these in the collection of the Kerala Council of Historical research is the only available written source of information as there aren't many books or journal articles written about this period as it is of but little interest to western academics. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jkl1805 (talk • contribs) 10:36, 30 August 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 01:37, 2 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.