Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kessler – Francis – Cardoza


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:23, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

Kessler – Francis – Cardoza

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No non-trivial sources found. Google asks if I meant "Cardozo" but that turns up no results at all. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 19:03, 27 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete. If the firm were still operating, and had some high-profile project, then we might find some notability - maybe. I don't see that, here, though. We have a defunct firm (closed 6 years ago) with no sourcing. The firm might bear mention in the articles for prominent projects, if a source supports it - but most of those projects are redlinks anyway, so that seems unlikely. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 20:16, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:23, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:23, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Notability not even claimed, much less demonstrated. --MelanieN (talk) 23:38, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.