Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kethi Kilonzo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. with no prejudice against speedy renomination (non-admin closure) czar   &middot;   &middot;  02:20, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Kethi Kilonzo

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The given sources, I feel, are not enough to establish the topic's notability. I also think that just because of the fact that a person gave an "outstanding performance" on something does not make it appropriate to have a Wikipedia article on him/her.  smt cha hal  (talk) 06:37, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Kenya-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:52, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:52, 16 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar   &middot;   &middot;  14:06, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

 Comment The current references is the article include at least two in-depth articles substantially about the subject from apparently reliable sources (the Sunday Nation and The Standard (Kenya)). As both have clearly been occasioned by the subject's participation in a recent high-profile political court case, there may be some BLP1E issues - but at least one of the articles seems to state that the subject has also taken part in some previous high-profile cases. If these can be further substantiated from reliable sources, then the BLP1E issues would no longer apply and the article should then be kept. PWilkinson (talk) 21:43, 27 April 2013 (UTC) 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Theopolisme ( talk )  01:11, 30 April 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.