Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keurboomstrand, Western Cape


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Keep after Capitalistroadster's rewrite.--May the Force be with you! Shreshth91 ($ |-| r 3 $ |-| t |-|) 09:15, 20 November 2005 (UTC)

Keurboomstrand, Western Cape
NN + advertising. Is this even a real place? GeeCee 05:25, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Article title seems to have no relation to content, which is a blurb for a web portal . Saberwyn 05:42, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep per Capitalistroadster's overhaul. Saberwyn 22:29, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Rewrite if Keurboomstrand exists, and delete if it doesn't. --MacRusgail 14:01, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
 * CR has made a proper article of it, keep --MacRusgail 15:21, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Keurboomstrand exists: it's a real place on the Plettenberg Bay in South Africa. However, the present article is just an advert, and Google is unable to provide any useful information on the place to build a stub from - there is simply too much Googlespam to sift through. Get rid of this for now, unless someone else has better luck salvaging it. &mdash; Haeleth Talk 17:39, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep now that it's a proper article about the place. Nice rescue job. &mdash; Haeleth Talk 22:19, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Article has been rewritten as a South African geo stub. Real resort with archaeological site of significance nearby. Capitalistroadster 19:01, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep as of Capitalistroadster's rewrite. I'm unsure what I should do as the article nominator at this point. Should I remove the nomination from the AFD list, or just let it run its course? GeeCee 23:46, 15 November 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.