Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kevan Moezzi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Eddie891 Talk Work 20:33, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

Kevan Moezzi

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

WP:BLP of a comedian, not properly sourced as passing notability criteria for comedians. As always, comedians are not "inherently" notable just because they exist, and have to show evidence of passing WP:GNG on reliable source media coverage about them -- but this is referenced predominantly to primary sources that are not support for notability, such as YouTube videos and event calendar listings. And of the just three footnotes that represent any sort of media coverage, two of them come from university student newspapers, which would be acceptable for use if the other sourcing were better but can't carry passage of GNG all by themselves. Only one hit out of 11 represents a journalist writing about him in a real media outlet of record, and that isn't enough. Bearcat (talk) 20:00, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Entertainment and United States of America. Bearcat (talk) 20:00, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nevada-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:59, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete: Rotten Tomatoes has a bare bio, so there just isn't much of anything. His highest hits are a Reddit thread and a Getty Image link. This is but a photo. I don't see any sourcing for this fellow.  Oaktree b (talk) 02:12, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete - again, YouTube followers are not a measure of notability. Virtually no presence on other social media: few followers on Insta; 14 connections on LinkedIn. One Reddit thread and a Getty photo do not constitute significant coverage. Bearian (talk) 16:33, 5 April 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.