Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kevin Aguanno


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 00:23, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

Kevin Aguanno

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails Notability. Most of the provided sourced are related to the subject and non-reliable, including his LinkedIn page and his employer's website. Hirolovesswords (talk) 05:09, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:31, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:32, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:32, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:32, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:32, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:32, 9 March 2014 (UTC)


 * delete Self promotional article about someone who is active at selling books about Scrum and Agile, but who has had no significant influence on these techniques. Contrast to the Agile Manifesto and the original 17 signatories to it (Wikipedia, of course, doesn't even consider these originals as notable). Aguanno isn't even a post facto signatory to it. Andy Dingley (talk) 20:17, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. Too few cites on GS for WP:Prof. Xxanthippe (talk) 10:15, 12 March 2014 (UTC).
 * Delete. The only accomplishments of significance listed in the article are publishing stuff (being a supporter of something isn't an accomplishment). But his publications don't seem to have had the impact needed to pass either WP:PROF or WP:AUTHOR. Failing that, what is there to say about him? —David Eppstein (talk) 17:05, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.