Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kevin Cariato (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Speedy deleted, G4. Non admin close. Umbralcorax (talk) 22:17, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Kevin Cariato
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Ok, there are a few references, but I can't spot why some campaign flunkey is now notable and not just another piece of indiscriminate information. "Mail and Messenger Managwr"? So he's a mailman? Fiddle Faddle (talk) 18:59, 28 January 2009 (UTC)


 * This is a hoax. A good hoax. But a hoax. Check the references closely. For example: # ^ http://www.whitehouse.gov.administration.home-html.org/  and http://www.change.gov.transitionupdate.com/ These are fake sites. This should be a quick deletion. Simon12 (talk) 19:53, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
 * A hoax? How do you figure that these are fake sites? Glass  Cobra  20:21, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The transition site is www.change.gov. www.change.gov.transitionupdate.com could be owned by anyone, and should not be considered reliable. Doing a little research shows it's a private site, created on January 13, 2009, and not a government site. The White House official site is at www.whitehouse.gov.  www.whitehouse.gov.administration.home-html.org is another private site. The democratic-underground cite is likely taken from Wikipedia. It doesn't provide an external link anywhere else, so can not be considered reliable.

This one http://www.senate.gov.nominationsindex-html.org/   is a really good fake, but, again, it's not the Senate site. That would be here: http://www.senate.gov/pagelayout/legislative/one_item_and_teasers/nom_cmtec.htm, and Cariato is nowhere to be found.

Whoever is doing this hoax has been at it for two months, and the name is getting out there. I was taken in at first, also. But until someone provides one actual, real, verifiable source for this, it should be considered a hoax. Simon12 (talk) 20:56, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
 * More importantly, White House staff are not subject to Senate confirmation. Rahm Emmanuel didn't need to be confirmed. If that's not a giveaway, I don't know what is. A speedy delete is quite warranted. Simon12 (talk) 20:58, 28 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.