Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kevin Carvell (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete, noting that the proposed redirect target is also at AfD. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:05, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Kevin Carvell
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Due to some events this past year, it has come to my attention that there are some articles and images regarding me and my former business on Wikipedia. And while eager and well-meaning, I believe a former associate of mine is responsible, at least in part, for this content. Both articles either contain some privileged information or general inaccuracies. I’m not really sure why this article still exists... at least not in its present state. I would have to agree with the article’s notation of questionable notability. Most of my career has been spent simply as a consultant at its base. Hardly noteworthy. It’s only been in the last couple of years that I’ve moved up to executive produce films like The Christmas Dragon and A Dog Named Gucci. And if that and other more notable events in recent years didn’t make enough noise to find their way to this page, I’m not sure what I’m still doing here. Heck, even our director for The Christmas Dragon, John Lyde, and many of its actors, producers, and companies should have an article before I should. Beyond that, the “Family and early life” is riddled with errors. The “1990s” and other areas are a mess, as well. And as for this photo of me, while it was provided to my company for use in press and promotion at that time, I’m not sure it was meant to be used in this way. Kevin carvell (talk) 11:00, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete or redirect to Flashpoint Studios. Clearly not notable as an actor, and people rarely become notable for being executive producers. While we have an article on the production company (which also looks dubious regarding notability) it may be worth redirecting there. I have removed the wholly unsourced 'Family and early life' section. --Michig (talk) 12:57, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  sst  ✈  13:23, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  sst  ✈  13:23, 18 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Flashpoint Studios per Michig. sst  ✈  13:24, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Redirect as mentioned, perhaps best known for that and there being nothing else for a convincingly better article. SwisterTwister   talk  05:23, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: User has also proposed that Flashpoint Studios be deleted. undefinedHydronium~Hydroxide~(Talk)  06:16, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete with no re-direct as Flashpoint Studios is under afd.The subject has not produced enough films to meet WP:CREATIVE or WP:GNGAtlantic306 (talk) 22:31, 23 January 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.