Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kevin Gillese


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:13, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

Kevin Gillese

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Was restored (by me) per a request at WP:REFUND. I do not see a significant claim to notability for this entirely unsourced BLP. l'aquatique [talk]  00:56, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 03:11, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete-wow, a completely nn autobio who's related to two more nn's nobody ever heard of! Wikipedia at it's, um, well...--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 11:28, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Probably keep. Did you look for sources? Driveby !votes like Kintesubuffalo's aren't worth making, please make some more effort. He has received press coverage, e.g. Winnipeg Free Press, New Zealand Herald, Edmonton Sun, Creative Loafing Atlanta, Access Atlanta,. An alternative to deletion, if he's deemed non-notable despite media attention, could be a selective merge to Dad's Garage Theatre Company, where he is the artistic director. Fences  &amp;  Windows  22:02, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
 * And the horse you rode in on. Keep your snide comments to yourself. I looked at what was there, which is what is being called for deletion, and saw nothing worthy of note, nor in your sources. You make your edits, I'll make mine. Demeaning me for opposing you on a dubious bio is against NPA.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 04:50, 10 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.  --  Fences  &amp;  Windows  22:03, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand and improve through regular editing. Sources in the article show meeting WP:GNG for multiple events, and additional sources as offered by User:Fences and windows put the icing on the cake. Notability to Canada is notable enough for en.Wikipedia.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 02:50, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:HEY. Great job on the article rescue! Bearian (talk) 17:20, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:GNG. Rudybowwow (talk) 15:38, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.