Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kevin Hammond


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Keep - consensus seems to be "keep" after relistings. &mdash; Anonymous Dissident  Talk 15:43, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

Kevin Kato Hammond

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

He's a guy with a website. He and his site are mentioned in a few places, but that doesn't make either notable, per se. Also, a lot of edits were made by User:Thekato813, and Hammond's nickname is "Kato" - that user uploaded the image of Hammond and tagged it under GFDL-self, so there could be some conflict of interest. AW (talk) 19:27, 20 August 2008 (UTC) 
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  00:54, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  00:54, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, --Falcon Darkstar Kirtaran (talk) 04:18, 26 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep - He's been quoted in multiple articles about the washington go-go scene and I am going to presume notability under the general criteria of WP:BIO. Morbidthoughts (talk) 22:19, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep, because of the mentions in mainly the Washington Post. Conflict of interest might be true, but does not seem to be an issue as the article is written fairly neutral in point of view. --Reinoutr (talk) 10:19, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep due to coverage in reliable third-party sources. Meets WP:N.  Article seems more or less neutral, so no pressing COI concerns as far as I can tell.  Lankiveil (speak to me) 12:02, 4 September 2008 (UTC).


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.