Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kevin Healey (autism activist)(3rd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination and deletion votes from confirmed sockpuppets. Yunshui 雲 水 07:56, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

Kevin Healey (autism activist)
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.

This page has clearly been made for self promotion purposes only, the individual is non-notable and as you can see via the talk page he has been involved in paying people to create the page, edit the page and vote on the AfD discussions. This sort of behavior should not be tolerated or encouraged at all as it is a clear violation of Wikipedia standards Iamricednous (talk) 01:41, 27 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Procedural Keep. Quoting User:Carrite in last AFD: "After an AfD in 2015 [and another in 2017], result was Keep. Notability is not temporary, nor have community standards changed since then. Stop wasting our time." --Doncram (talk) 03:31, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
 * And perhaps investigate the deletion nominator, are they a sock puppet as nominated this page previously? --Doncram (talk) 03:31, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Maybe you can start the sock-puppet investigation I would do it if I could nominate myself. Seems like you have a lot of self interest towards this page were you someone Kevin paid to vote as well? I am not saying anything new. I am just saying what has been done in the past. Iamricednous (talk) 03:50, 27 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Strong Delete Non-notable autism activist. Wikipedia is a encyclopedia not a place to self promote. FrederickWinchester  talk  03:45, 27 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Procedural Keep - This matter was decided in 2015. Community standards have not changed since then. Notability is not temporary. We can't be endlessly relitigating the decisions made at AFD. Carrite (talk) 14:06, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep. There are plenty of reliable sources cited in the article in which Healey is the subject, sufficient to meet criteria in Notability (people).  The two previous AFDs in 2015 and 2017 came to the same conclusion and I don't see that anything has changed.  Considering the article's recent history of disruptive deletion-related edits from multiple new accounts, the closing admin should note that the only editors recommending deletion here are new accounts as well.  Edgeweyes (talk) 15:45, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep notability is not temporary. If this page was kept back in 2015, and again in 2017, it should be kept again per previously established consensus. Tillerh11 (talk) 20:33, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete The individual is not notable enough to be on Wikipedia with there being little no references on the individual. Inightfox (talk) 02:04, 28 June 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.