Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kevin Lavelle


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Black Kite (talk) 20:39, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

Kevin Lavelle

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Promotional article, part of a promotional campaign for his company, written by a single-purpose account. The references are either about the company, or are mere notices of trivial award. The only extensive ref, in the NYT, is about the clothing, not the person--and, as I see it represents a promotional interview where the subject says what he pleases. The news parts of the NYT don't do that, but the columns do, and they are no longer reliable for notability,  (the other sources just repeat the same material)  DGG ( talk ) 17:02, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:18, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:18, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington, D.C.-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:19, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kpg  jhp  jm  01:19, 24 September 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete a non-notable businessman.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:47, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kpg  jhp  jm  01:57, 1 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Reduced or delete The title of CEO, the Ernst and Young award and his featuring in the NYTimes give pause, but most of the content here is good only for a personal or perhaps a company page. It reads as self-promotion. Leaving only the lede would perhaps be better than deleting. Caballero / Historiador⎌ 10:24, 1 October 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.