Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kevin Leckner


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. postdlf (talk) 03:21, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

Kevin Leckner

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Per original prod "No WP:RS references that establish the subject as being notable; only references are a database listing and the site of the subject's own company". I'd also like to add that there is a publication reference, but we shouldn't base the whole article on one source. That source is also very questionable, I can't find if it's this magazine or this one. It might be [www.northjersey.com/ this one], a local magazine for New Jersey. Bluefist  talk 16:09, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - looks like a typical vanity piece about a self-inflated movie mogul with no actual rep in the industry. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  16:39, 24 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete - per G11, pure promo, so tagged. ukexpat (talk) 17:02, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:19, 24 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete was declined, as any promotion can easily fixed by editing. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:42, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment - still a vanity bio about a non-notable individual. – ukexpat (talk) 13:08, 25 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Comment This article is just one of many that were created in order to promote Starline Films, its staff (such as Kevin Leckner, Jonathan Doscher and Fran Ganguzza), and films (4CHOSEN: The Documentary). All were created by accounts such as User:Michelle.starlinefilms (who switched to User:Michelitac when the other name was blocked) and User:LauraatStarline. It's one big tangled promo-fest. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 14:39, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Looks promotional and non-notable. I share the feelings about the 'promo-fest'. Peridon (talk) 14:17, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.