Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kevin McCabe (economist)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Sam Sailor Talk! 16:24, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Kevin McCabe (economist)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not meet any of the criteria at WP:ACADEMIC. Only claim made for notability is that he is 'pioneer' in his field, but this is uncited. LK (talk) 03:54, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable economist.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:16, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
 * See WP:JUSTNOTNOTABLE. North America1000 02:44, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep. Clear pass of WP:PROF#1 - GScholar shows an h-index of 47, including one paper with nearly 4000 citations and two others with over 1000. PWilkinson (talk) 23:44, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:34, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. North America1000 02:35, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 02:35, 19 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep. Pass of WP:Prof . Nominator is directed to WP:Before. Xxanthippe (talk) 02:41, 19 June 2016 (UTC).
 * Keep. RePEc lists him in their top 5% of world economics authors (actually closer to top 3%) and the top one at George Mason U. That should be good enough for WP:PROF. —David Eppstein (talk) 05:13, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep per high rank in indexing services.Jonpatterns (talk) 16:26, 20 June 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.