Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kevin Michael Grace


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 18:23, 9 December 2018 (UTC)

Kevin Michael Grace

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:BIO. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 05:29, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:40, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:40, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:41, 17 November 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep probably. He is a journalist, and so needs to meet WP:JOURNALIST: "1. The person is regarded as an important figure or is widely cited by peers or successors." In addition to the two references in which he is cited already included in the article, eg in Theatre Research in Canada, Volume 17, Culture Meets Culture in the Movies , Filtering the news , Animated 'worlds ' , The Unz Review here and here , and other blogs  and websites  and . RebeccaGreen (talk) 08:36, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. People do not qualify for Wikipedia articles just because we can technically verify their existence via glancing namechecks of their existence in reliable source coverage about other things, or because of anything published on any blog — to establish that "the person is regarded as an important figure or is widely cited by peers or successors", what we require is coverage about him which analyzes his significance in that regard. But the sources listed above aren't doing that at all — they all just briefly namecheck his existence rather than contextualizing his importance. Bearcat (talk) 01:07, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete, there's no indication or evidence in this article to support notability...... PK T (alk)  15:55, 21 November 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   12:44, 25 November 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   11:34, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete Per @Bearcat. PlotHelpful (talk) 13:54, 2 December 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.