Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kevin Skrepnek/VfD


 * Vanity. RickK | Talk 00:51, 4 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete -- Cyrius | Talk 01:49, Apr 4, 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Better than some I've seen, but still not quite there. Niteowlneils 06:20, 4 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Note that Mr. Skrepnek is acting in bad faith, and has deleted notice of this VfD on the article page. Cribnotes 06:25, 4 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * I reverted and protected the page. RickK | Talk 06:44, 4 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * Angela has removed your protection. Note that no talk page yet exists for this article. Cribnotes 06:50, 4 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * See Unprotected page and Talk:Kevin Skrepnek. Angela. 07:17, Apr 4, 2004 (UTC)
 * What does having a talk page have to do with anything? RickK | Talk 07:39, 4 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * (a) Angela suggests that The Professor might be a new user, unfamiliar with VfD, etc. She has a point, but I think that makes it logical to offer him/her information on the talk page. (b) For the benefit of VfD voters, who may feel inclined to alter or add to the page, I believe a note might have been left on the talk page to explain the (un)protected status. Just my two cents, so I'll bow out now. Cribnotes 07:50, 4 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete: vanity. Wile E. Heresiarch 13:58, 7 Apr 2004 (UTC)