Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kevin Sundher


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 08:48, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Kevin Sundher

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

fails WP:NHOCKEY Joeykai (talk) 03:39, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. /wiae  /tlk  15:32, 12 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep 75th overall is pretty good Jigglypuff 109 (talk) 23:28, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
 * That doesn't make him notable. Joeykai (talk) 03:46, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
 * One, I'm afraid, of a number of spurious Keeps in the last week by this new editor. Upon what basis do you think he's notable?   Ravenswing   04:30, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete: Career minor-leaguer with no particular accomplishments. Fails both NHOCKEY and the GNG, doesn't meet any notability criteria.   Ravenswing   04:30, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor Talk! 16:01, 19 May 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:39, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. North America1000 02:43, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. North America1000 02:43, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 02:43, 26 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails to meet NHOCKEY and I can't see anything meeting GNG. -DJSasso (talk) 12:02, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - Not finding significant coverage to meet WP:GNG. Rlendog (talk) 16:51, 1 June 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.