Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kevin Surovcik


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  10:26, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

Kevin Surovcik

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Restore redirect to LECG Corporation. No evidence of WP:N. feminist (talk) 05:19, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. feminist (talk) 05:20, 25 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete: no evidence of notability, possible WP:COI editor who has been repeatedly removing maintenance templates and now AfD templates. Melcous (talk) 06:34, 25 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Do not delete : Was c suite position at major consulting firm and very important to the firm. Although I do believe that the article has things to be fixed, I do not think it should be deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:45:8180:E5A0:DC4A:79EB:F67:6280 (talk) 08:31, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! Baby miss  fortune 11:13, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! Baby miss  fortune 11:14, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

* Keep : Although there are not many sources I still think that him having a bloomberg profile makes him important enough to have a wiki page. I believe that Most business execs (C Suite) should have wiki pages because they are leaders in their companies and make very important decisions regarding our economy and business. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ExecBios (talk • contribs) 17:49, 27 December 2017 (UTC) — Note to closing admin: ExecBios (talk • contribs)  is the creator of the page that is the subject of this XfD.
 * Merge: Not much reliable coverage, I agree that merging/redirecting back to LECG Corporation is the best option.  Grey joy talk 01:02, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete just because creating more and more Chief X-thing Officer positions is in vogue, does not mean we have to create more and more articles for each person who gets so designated.John Pack Lambert (talk) 06:01, 27 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Striking out sock vote by confirmed sock puppet account.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   00:17, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

*Keep: Bloomberg is a reliable source and there is no credible evidence of a paid biography. How is Bloomberg not a credible source and how is it biased? Bloomberg covers businesspeople and executives with an un-biased lenze. — Preceding unsigned comment added by FeministEnthusiasm (talk • contribs) — FeministEnthusiasm (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Delete, fails WP:BIO. Notability is not inherited, and I can't see significant independent coverage online in WP:RS, just lots of self-published rent-a-bios on the usual sites like Bloomberg. The Mighty Glen (talk) 01:25, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails WP:BIO. also the architect of this page using the name "ExecBios" has a history of vandalizing the Devon Preparatory School page.Wa3frp (talk) 23:54, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Striking out sock vote by confirmed sock puppet account.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   00:17, 29 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Do Not Delete There is not enough reliable coverage, but, he is notable enough for a wiki page. ExecBios needs to stop vandalizing pages and should be banned for that. I don't get why people think its self-done, if it was there would be more mention of not true "accomplishments". — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adrian Six Five (talk • contribs) 23:45, 28 December 2017 (UTC)  — Adrian Six Five (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Striking out sock vote by confirmed sock puppet account.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   00:17, 29 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Comment for reviewing admins - just before the two obvious sockpuppet additions above, article creator User:ExecBios attempted to delete another editor's post in this edit. The Mighty Glen (talk) 00:11, 29 December 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.