Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Key4ce


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. postdlf (talk) 03:26, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Key4ce

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG, WP:SPAM, WP:RS and WP:CORP. None of the listed references are reliable secondary sources. They are press releases, marketing claims, and advertising sites. Appears to be written by their marketing department. It's an advertisement pretending to be a encyclopedic article. - Becksguy (talk) 14:13, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.  Everymorning   talk  15:52, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:42, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:42, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:42, 18 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete. Apparently, I agree with you, because I tagged it as non-notable back in December 2014.  Looking through Google, I don't see any reliable sources.  Maybe I was going to nominate it for deletion and forgot. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:13, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - not seeing a lot of coverage. Seems to fail WP:GNG and WP:PRODUCT. --ceradon ( talk  •  contribs ) 01:24, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.