Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Key Result Area


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. Fram (talk) 14:00, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Key Result Area

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Contested prod; removed by author without explanation. Article is a WP:COATRACK for Michael Ludlow's writings. Ludlow is a COI as he has created this article. Aside from that, article fails WP:V and WP:RS. &mdash;  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 23:39, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete User:HelloAnnyong nailed it; agree with all of those reasons. —Preceding unsigned comment added by BowChickaNeowNeow (talk • contribs) 20:58, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable, and apparently unsuccessful attempt to coin a business neologism by repurposing a common English phrase to stand for something so obvious it needs no definition.  The article is completely unsourced and its content entirely unencyclopedic.  It reads like a poorly-written jacket summary of a self-help book. Wikidemo (talk) 15:08, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete unencyclopedic, has no WP:RS.  Otolemur crassicaudatus  (talk) 17:04, 13 February 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.