Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Key songs of the new age scene


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. --Core desat  02:18, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

Key songs of the new age scene


This wouldn't be so bad were it not for the fact that there are no sources whatsoever (WP:RS), turning it into a subjective squabble about which songs are or aren't "key songs". (Not all the artists on there are even New Age.) Crystallina 01:58, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. As nom mentioned, the article doesn't define clearly what criteria makes a song a "key song" or not.-- TBC Φ  talk?  02:13, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. There will never, ever, ever be a way to keep this article from being a POV fan's list. OfficeGirl 02:33, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Useless arbitary list. MER-C 03:03, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. No way at this point to subjectively determine the key songs. Maybe in a century we can. Robovski 03:12, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Arbitrary list with no standard for inclusion or rejection.-- Kf4bdy talk contribs 03:55, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete purely arbitrary. Lankiveil 05:28, 11 November 2006 (UTC).
 * Delete. Could use some sources, and even then it would need renaming. For example, if this was Rolling Stone's key songs of New Age, then it should be renamed to something that reflects that. As it stands, however, it's just POV dribble. Oddly enough, the creator User:Acidburn24m is something of an experienced contributor who you would think would know how to write a proper article. Black-Velvet  06:13, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, listcruft, POV list. --Ter e nce Ong (C 06:54, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - unsourced, POV -- Whpq 12:11, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete -- per officegirl. --Christofurio 17:09, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete The very name makes it arbitrary. ¿ςפקι Д Иτς! ☺ ☻ 18:51, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.  P.B. Pilh e  t  /  Talk  19:19, 11 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete - Someone's playlist belongs in someone's MP3 player, not on Wikipedia.  --Nehwyn 21:29, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
 * In the creator's defense, I think the only common ground these share is that these songs may have charted on Billboard or somesuch at one point or another, and many of them are good songs. Hell, I like Enya, especially her early stuff.  But, as is also pointed out here in the AfD post, there's too broad of a definition to what constitutes a "key song" to new age music, and frankly, I'm not about to go researching these songs on Billboard to see if they charted at all.  That, and as per what Nehwyn pointed out, this looks an awful lot like somebody's iPod playlist.  Delete.  --71.216.9.26 07:53, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment - the above was me. Don't know why I bumped off.... --Dennisthe2 07:54, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - per Nehwyn. And I never want to meet the person with that MP3 player. Freshacconci 02:33, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
 * If anyone can find sources, I recommened that it be merged into New Age music and turn the section into something like this. --Andylkl [ talk! 08:19, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.