Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keyboard Sathya


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. W.marsh 14:06, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

Keyboard Sathya

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Notable? Neutralitytalk 02:53, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Neutral: The POGO award is no reason to keep, as that is not notable. But there are actually albums listed, so I don't know if this is notable or not.  There are about 1,800 G-hits so maybe this person is notable? - Rjd0060 05:11, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak keep There are about 4 albums that appear to be legitimately published (i.e. not self-published), albeit not readily available. Agree that POGO is weak reason for keeping, but there does seem to be some notability (which does need to be bolstered a bit in the article).  SkierRMH 06:07, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. The album releases do not satisfy the requirements of point #5 of WP:MUSIC and the award appears to be too minor to satisfy point #8.  Adrian M. H.  10:13, 23 October 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.