Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keychain Logistics


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 03:12, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Keychain Logistics

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Searches are noticeably finding nothing but published and republished PR and that's exactly what this article, its information, sources and history confirm in this hence WP:NOT applies; there's no compromises when it's clear Wikipedia was misused as an advertising webhost. When an article so blatantly focuses with overblown advertising and yet its sources are themselves, that's self-explanatory. We explicitly stated in our first policies that we would never accept advertising, there's nothing to suggest we should accept them now. SwisterTwister  talk  22:21, 20 December 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2016 December 20.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 22:43, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, st170e talk 00:15, 28 December 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete Repackaged PR and bare listings are only apparent sources at this time. YCombinator itself is notable, but that notability is not automatically inherited by its incubatees. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 02:15, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –  Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:19, 5 January 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 07:32, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails GNG and WP:CORPDEPTH. Probably WP:TOOSOON. -- HighKing ++ 20:35, 17 January 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.