Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KeyedBits


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:11, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

KeyedBits

 * – ( View AfD View log )

WP:NOTABILITY - documents a new format created this month; only gets 2 non-Wikipedia google hits. Wikipedia is not for things made up one day Nat Gertler (talk) 17:43, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 17:49, 25 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. Oh, my.  Not even close to satisfying WP:GNG.  Blatantly WP:MADEUP.  Msnicki (talk) 18:41, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Only a step away from original research. &mdash; RHaworth 21:18, 26 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete Article lacks reliable third party sources and is almost entirely comprised of origional research. Alpha_Quadrant    (talk)    02:52, 1 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep New and interesting data structure. In the world of computing and development there is a lot of original research and some of the best things are created on a whim. There is great potential in the concept and project, if the wiki page was given a little more effort. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.69.26.202 (talk) 03:25, 1 October 2011 (UTC)  — 173.69.26.202 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Speedy delete as a hoax. At the very least it's absolutely WP:MADEUP. - The Bushranger One ping only 05:38, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.