Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keyssa (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Molex. If there are questions about having a different redirect target, you can raise the question on the redirect talk page or at WP:RFD. Liz Read! Talk! 05:59, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

Keyssa
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Restored to userspace (courtesy following a Refund request) but then restored to mainspace without going through AfC or addressing the issues raised at AfD. Still no WP:ORG level coverage Star   Mississippi  14:54, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Companies, Technology,  and California.  Star   Mississippi  14:54, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Sigh, we just had this one. Should be merged or redirected to Molex. Oaktree b (talk) 15:34, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
 * The nature of the semiconductor industry is consolidation of important technologies into larger companies - there are very few small companies left, but the importance of the acquired companies lives on as these companies have built the technology base of the large semiconductor companies that remain todayhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semiconductor_consolidation Kmr719 (talk) 01:43, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Merge to Molex. To my eye, only one reference would meet WP:SIRS, the Stanford case, from which I am restricted. Rhadow (talk) 19:01, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
 * I've read a couple of HBR "case studies" in the past and they're a mixed bag of quality. They can be very thin on "Independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking" (as per ORGIND). Looking at the summary for this case study, it reads as if it recounts events that has occurred already, I don't see any indications of independent content. Also, concerned that the company itself seems to be using it to "promote' themselves by providing "first-hand insights" on the case study.  HighKing++ 15:24, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks for comments, references will be expanded and added shortly; Kmr719 (talk) 01:44, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
 * This is part of why this article should not have been moved back to mainspace. Star   Mississippi  13:20, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Salvio giuliano 00:35, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Draftify to give another chance at improving it before moving it to mainspace. A redirect to Molex could be left in mainspace. MarioGom (talk) 19:11, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Koch Industries (or Molex although I don't believe Molex would survive at AfD either). Kmr719 participated in the original AfD for this topic company and we should take a very dim view of attempts to circumvent a previous decision at AfD by moving from drafts to mainspace without addressing the issues as he did. This topic company fails GNG/NCORP criteria for establishing notability.  HighKing++ 15:14, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Redirect as the High King has suggested. Lightburst (talk) 04:12, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Redirect - Per arguments above. No opposition to merge as well, though don't see what content could be worth keeping. — Ixtal ( T / C ) &#8258; Non nobis solum. 11:29, 27 February 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.