Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keytrans


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. postdlf (talk) 21:10, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

Keytrans

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unlikely to be notable per WP:CORP. A Google News archive search brings up six entries for "Keytrans", three of which predate the company's foundation; one of which, in Portuguese, might not refer to this company; and two of which seem to be identical copies of a press release (or an article so promotional it ought to be a press release) discussing the sale of the developer to a bigger company. The company's web site has long since disappeared. This is very far from "significant coverage". Alexrexpvt (talk) 18:48, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete I added one news article from 2006 as a reference, but it is basically a press release and not enough to establish notability. AllyD (talk) 19:20, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Have to agree with AllyD, the article is very adverty and unsourced. The situation isn't helped by having a similar name to other companies with an online presence. Being India-based there's a possibility coverage exists in other languages, But I can only find this one, dating from when it was launched in 2006. Sionk (talk) 19:24, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails general notability guidlines. Puffery. --Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 22:26, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:29, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:29, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:29, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.