Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kezia Noble (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:21, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

Kezia Noble
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article about a blogger / occasional soundbite about how to increase men's chances of dating women successfully. The article was created by a sock (but before the sockmaster was blocked, so not eligible for WP:CSD) and originally declined at AfC by and , before having the AfC template scrubbed and being moved into mainspace. A search for sources brings up either tabloid journalism, or things she's written - but as far as mainstream broadsheet coverage goes, not a sausage. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  10:26, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 16:39, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 16:39, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 16:39, 20 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete Delete WP:GNG does not meet WP:BIO or meet WP:CS--EC Racing (talk) 19:05, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep This personality is meets notability requirements. Said person is clearly notable on YouTube as well as other areas.--INDIAN REVERTER (talk) 22:16, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: is now indefinitely blocked Ritchie333 (talk)  (cont)  10:42, 21 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Nothing more than a thinly-veiled advertisement. Oh, and being "notable on YouTube" doesn't mean anything. sixty nine   • speak up •  22:18, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. Seems to be PROMO for this person's business. Article created by now-blocked SPA that was briefly active in 2015. Article doesn't seem much different than the one deleted in 1st AfD in 2010. Agricola44 (talk) 21:03, 21 September 2017 (UTC).
 * Delete books are a dime a dozen, not all writers are notable, and nothing shows she is.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:22, 26 September 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.