Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khadija Mushtaq


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. There are very few comments here, despite 2 relists to attempt to get more participation. I am therefore closing as no consensus, with no prejudice to an earlier nomination than would be normal. Davewild (talk) 18:19, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

Khadija Mushtaq

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Not speedy-able because there is a weak claim of significance. Can't find any independent sources, all I can find are database entries. Basa lisk inspect damage⁄berate 16:36, 13 June 2012 (UT

I will add source by Tomorrow, Significance because of public personality, article will be expanded also.


 * Keep. I found enough in this citation  to indicate notability to me.  I confirmed that she received the Yale Educator Award in 2009 and the "Tamgha-e-Imtiaz" from the Persident of Pakistan -- that was sufficient for me, but there are multiple other awards cited that could be confirmed with more effort than I felt was required.  Ubelowme (talk) 17:54, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:45, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:45, 14 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:15, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 01:07, 27 June 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.